Hi everybody.
Goddamnit, can we please make the numbers go high enough so I can be ranked?
I think you will fit in the number scheme.
God, I am in tier 3 now?
I'm doing from bad to worse.
Suggest you just think of this list as temporary. Remember, the old list, that was used as the template, is pretty well outdated, so... we've got to get some updates going. Really hope no one takes any offense over this simply because its old poo.
I'd suggest the 1st task would be to remove folks that no longer play. I always went by > 30 days = no longer playing. I think to simplify, we should quickly added another TIER and call it unranked. We can just drop folks in there that we haven't agreed on their placement, etc. That way, we can add people that haven't been discussed recently or ever. Then, as we get into discussions, we can rank those players and dump them into tiers. And then the next step would be for individual player feedback saying "I think you guys are full of crap. I'm better than _____." And then we setup some sort of match and if they win, we agree we were wrong and advance them.
hehe... also, to translate some of the OP into slightly better English (no offense), howbout - feel free to copy the following and paste it into your op if you like.
This thread will be the new ranking list.I have talked this over with pacov and he approves.
The new rankings list will be updated and maintained by OMG_howboutnoooo. The rankings themselves will be decided by a committee including players of varied skill levels. The committee will be influenced by the community and also based on matches to determine player rankings. Additional members may be asked to join the committee to provide additional feedback and hopefully aid in providing accurate rankings. The following individuals are currently either on the committee or have been asked to become members:
I've read in the original thread that it might be a good idea for people who want into a certain rank or into the list to prove their skill by beating certain people. Well it seems to be a good idea and will be discussed by the commity so if you want to start proving your stuff submit replays and youll be considered.
thanks pacov
Koush and ninki in one committee, not in this demigod world
However it would make up for interesting tier results.
Imma just bring forward my short list that I created from Pacov's old thread, just cause I think it is a great starting place.
Tier 1:Orcun
Tier 1.5:Boxxy_Koush
Boxxy_Renz
GM-Zen_God
GM-McShane87
Boxxy_Mithrandar
RAWRRRR
Tier 2:
2nana
Pacov
Nomliarac
GM-Janook
cowbuttzex
kalelsmx
abuggeredhedgie/awuffleablehedgie
PeterDumpTruck
Tier 2.5:
Shreddy (Slowly creeping up to tier 2, I like the guy)
Magnus3333333333
DD_Karebears
Soccer-mom
NinkiCZ
The rest of you.
Also me and Ninki on the same committee? Sheesh, that is gonna be intresting, Ninki said he doesn't care about the tier system anymore so I don't know why he is on it, but then again Ninki says a lot of things so I'll let it slide.
Also I'd like to request some 2 v 2's (Me and Renz) against Zex and a partner of his choosing, why? Cause I haven't played with him in ages and I need to see if he's a badass now or what before I have an current opinion on the guy.
I would disagree with peter on par with the rest in that tier... although depending on how you define the tiers, I can see him being there. He can be AMAZING provided he is with the right teammates, but if his teammates don't understand his play style it can be no bueno fast. I guess it depends on how you classify the tiers lol
That's the problem I'm having Rawrrr, on the one hand most of the time he comprimises the game lol, however the guy in the right situation has tons of potential, I'm conflicted. All things considered I still feel Peter is more Tier 2 then 2.5, just cause he has the potential. But who knows, I'm still mulling it over.
This "ranking" is going a bit too far for no reason. Why make game against another tier ?? Just to proove u're better and can get in another tier ? You cant determinate this by only one game. BTW i think tier 1 to 4 will be good. Keep this threat active
That was my thought as well. Just having people with the exact same opinion of player talent in the committee will result in their POV, right or wrong, being more dominant in the rankings. So, if we look at players talents from multiple angles, hopefully we will get a more accurate picture.
I still say we're in a good spot with not being able to view old replays.
I think all the decisions made should be off new replays so it shows current abilities. I don't think anyone should just be moved without a current one.
But that's just me.
How do you upload a replay?
The End.